• The closed door meeting was part of the first " intelligence insight forum".More than 60 senators sat down at the platform, listening to the platform, and intelligence ethicsist and intelligence ethics ethics.
• Technology companies have generally recognized the idea of regulatory ideas, but there are no consensus, but there are many specific differences.Mck and Zkberg sat in the position of the distance, Marske also had a dispute.
On 13 September, the U. Senate held a closed door briefing session, more than 20 silicon Valley CEO and intelligence ethics ethicsists sat on the platform.
On 13 September, the United States Senate held a different briefing session, the United States Senate, participants, who were the largest monopoly party, was called "plated by the largest monopoly party.
Usually, Members sitting on the platform, the Honourable Members of the platform, more than 60 senators sitting below the end of the closed door, listening to the platform, listen to the platform.
"The chief executive of the journalists, SpaceX and X ( former push forward) "We have a referee for us, " said." "(c) may be included in history, because it is important to be important for civilization."”
Compared with the science fiction, some participants more emphasized that intelligence is more emphasized in the current reality.In the meeting, the SBSTA executives have generally recognized the idea of regulatory policy, but there is no consensus, but political road is still difficult to achieve the political road.
The CEO of the journalists, SpaceX and X ( former push-off) chief executive of the journalists.
"The development of artificial intelligence should follow the United States values"
The meeting of the United States Senate, is part of the first " Artificial Intelligence Forum".Each participants have three minutes to publish a speech, the Senate, the Senate, the Senate majority of the Party leader of the Senate, and the Senate majority of the Republican Senator Michael Schum.Despite a closed door, many participants received media interviews, many participants received media interviews on the details of the meeting.
"Do you need to play a role in supervision of intelligence?"Every one raised his hand, although they have different views."So this gives us a message: "We must try to act, despite the process of process, despite the process may be difficult."In the morning, Schum told reporters that legislation should be introduced in months, rather than years.
"I think people agree that it is that we need to government leadership, "Sam Altman (Sam Altman) said, "I think people agree."For how to happen, but it is important and urgent."”

Open AI CEO Sam Olman arrived at the meeting with reporters after the meeting.
The former CEO Eric Schck and Google's former CEO of Google, has raised the survival risk of intelligence, Microsoft's founder Bill Gates focused on solving global hunger.IBM CEO Alvin Krishna, said that the proposal against intelligence development permit.
Mark Zkberg said Mark Zkberg, said that closed and open source intelligence model.He said Meta is a way to ensure extensive use of technology, but Meta" is not enthusiastic."We're not open open source.We believe that closed mode is also good, but we also believe that more open ways to create more value."The next leading source model......from Abkhazia."”
Mark Zackberg left the meeting.
One speaker referred to article 230 of the Communication Code of Communication norms established in 1996 and the famous "230".The provisions of the Internet companies" to protect Internet companies from the content of the Internet companies from the content of third party."One of them, "Let's use of technology users and create responsibility."Don't make a Republican Senator Synthia Lummis, said, "Don't make a specialized artificial intelligence for artificial intelligence.'"’”
The Republican Senator Toledo, said that the development of intelligence should follow the United States values should follow the United States values.
One who would like to disclose the name of the name of the federal government, " helping to respond to us to us to respond to us-called change innovative innovative innovation".Schul told reporters that might need to create a $320 billion funds to help " maximize intelligence" benefits".
Mr. Huang-wei arrived at the meeting, who had not wearing leather jacket.
inequality, privacy, privacy, false news
There are many specific differences in meetings.Some of the idea of establish a comprehensive new intelligence institutions, and some of the existing entities — such as national standards and technical research institute (NIST) is better suited to implement regulatory regulatory regulatory.Mck later said that he thinks it might establish a regulators.Google CEO of Google, refused to disclose specific details, but the idea of Washington, but overall support Washington's idea of Washington participation.
Zkberg, Outman and Gates, " obvious differences in the morning, such as the risk of intelligence.He seemed to be a controversial issue of intelligence-driven automobile, according to a room, a person who seemed to be lightened by a person who was thinking about intelligent driving cars.
In addition to entrepreneurs and Members, the invitation of intelligence, experts also expounded concerns about intelligence.
The Forum on Civil Rights Organization of Spain, said that the Forum was still lacking information on the Forum, which has not been discussed and expand intelligence, but many Latin America.She said that this reality highlight how the gap between existing infrastructure gap in the artificial intelligence.