evaluation
-
Run into the paper statistics, helpless. On Qimo, I saw that Dr.Tong company provided the assistance of thesis statistics, and with the guidance and assistance of the doctor's teacher, I ran smoothly to get the results. Thank Dr.Tong for his high-level service.
Mr. Lin
from: tainan
-
When a doctoral dissertation encounters multiple linear regression, it has always been a difficult point and there is nothing to do. On Google, we can see that the doctor teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company provides statistical running and statistical guidance. The information and requirements to the doctor teacher, with the help of the teacher, smoothly run out the results. Thank you for the help and guidance from the doctor of Dr.Tong statistics company.
Dr. Li
from: taoyuan
-
When I met the difficulties in the statistical analysis of the doctoral thesis questionnaire, I couldn't find a clue. Finally, I saw Dr.Tong's assistance in the statistical analysis of the thesis questionnaire on qimo.com. With the assistance of the doctor, I got the results smoothly. Thank Dr.Tong for his assistance in the statistical analysis of the thesis questionnaire, which solved my urgent problem.
Dr. Li
from: Kaohsiung
-
Previously, a local statistics company in Hong Kong was entrusted, but it failed to do a good job in medical statistics. In my anxiety, I saw the doctor teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company provide statistical running and guidance, and sent the data and requirements to the doctor teacher. With the efforts of the doctor teacher, the analysis results were successfully made. I feel that Taiwan's statistics companies are more professional and the fees are reasonable.
Dr. Li
from: hongkong
-
Thank you for the efficient and high quality service provided by the doctor teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company. Solved my urgent need.
Mr. Lin
from: yunlin
-
When I met the difficulties in the statistical analysis of the pre-test and post-test of the thesis questionnaire, I couldn't solve them all the time. On Qimo, I saw that the doctoral teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company provided the tutoring service of thesis statistics, and sent the information and requirements to the doctoral teacher. With the help and guidance of the teacher, I got the results. Thank you very much for the tutoring service of the doctoral teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company There are two difficulties.
Miss Liu
from: Kaohsiung
-
It is difficult to analyze English papers by SPSS. On Google, we can see that the doctoral teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company provides the paper statistics running and guidance, sends the data and analysis requirements to the teacher, communicates with the teacher, and runs smoothly with the teacher's guidance and help. Thank you very much for the help of the doctor teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company. The teacher is serious, responsible and powerful.
Miss Zeng
from: london
-
It's difficult to analyze Stata data in accounting papers. On Yahoo Qimo, I saw the doctor teacher of Dr.Tong statistics company provide Stata statistical running guidance. The data and requirements were sent to the doctor's teacher. Under the guidance of the doctor's teacher, the Stata code was successfully designed, and the analysis results were also run out. I would like to thank the doctor's teacher of Dr.Tong statistics for his high level guidance and assistance.
Mr. Zhang
from: taizhong
-
Educational papers have quantitative statistics, which is a bit difficult! Helpless, I saw on Yahoo Qimo that Dr. and postdoctoral teachers from Dr.Tong Statistics Company provide doctoral thesis statistics and counseling services. I sent the questionnaire and sample data to the doctor, and with the guidance and assistance of the doctor, I successfully obtained the results and graduated. I am very grateful for the professional guidance of the doctor and postdoctoral teacher from Dr.Tong Statistics Company. The technical expertise, reliable quality, and reasonable fees have saved me a lot of trouble.
Dr. Song
from: Kaohsiung
|
|
|
|
| 2021-12-17 09:06:00 | onclick： | Eight suggestions for improvement of NSFC review |
 |
|
It has been four or five days since the national base released the list in 2020. On web forums such as xiaomuchong and guozr, some people said that it was normal and not strange to win, some expressed thanks and scattered gold coins, some said they were surprised, some were confused, and some said they couldn't believe it because they spent a lot of time and had a good working foundation There are those who lament or even despair (for example, some people say that they don't win, and their school has to go without promotion, so they can only find a new owner). Of course, some people have a good mentality, it doesn't matter, and they will talk about it in the coming year. It's normal for everyone to have different emotions due to different factors such as assessment pressure, career development and economic pressure in their unit.
The national base can only be obtained by a few people. This competitiveness ensures the gold content of the national base, but this competitiveness also requires the national base to improve the transparency and fairness of the review as much as possible. For the national foundation, improvement is always on the way. The blogger has some suggestions for the national foundation review.
1. The information of the applicant and the published journal of the paper block the reviewers of the letter evaluation and the meeting evaluation. The reviewers are required to judge the applicant's preliminary work by themselves, rather than simply looking at what the published journal of the paper is, which can also break the circle culture to a certain extent. In a sense, it is also a specific measure to break the five only.
2. The system is set so that the reviewer will first rate the core parts such as this sub research design, and then rate the work basis and working conditions. The system will automatically obtain the total rating of the application according to the two ratings. Avoid unnecessary interference between the two parts.
3. There are many contradictions between praise but poor score. In order to reduce this phenomenon to a certain extent, the comments and scores can be published to the applicant at the same time, putting pressure on some reviewers who do so. There is no need to be mysterious, let alone publish the reviewer information to the applicant.
4. If the letter evaluation clearly fails, that is, if the meeting is not held, there is no need to wait for the end of the meeting evaluation and notify it by email at the first time. The realization of this is very simple in technology and funds. In this way, most people don't have to wait so long.
5. It is not a technical problem that which department will release it after the evaluation.
6. As soon as there is a result, the applicant and the unit's science and technology department can check at the same time. Even the applicant should check it first to avoid the so-called relationship between some schools and some schools, forming an unnecessary and artificial unfair atmosphere.
7. Continuously improve the algorithm of machine matching application and evaluation experts. The NSFC has adopted the method of algorithm matching experts. For details, see Hu Jun, Hao Yanni, Xu Yanying, sun Ruijuan and others' article "intelligent discussion on peer review of NSFC projects", China Science Foundation, issue 2, 2019.
8. Appropriately reduce the average amount of funding and appropriately increase the number of funded projects. The fund committee can analyze and determine according to the previous fund use, results publication and input-output ratio.
Some of the above suggestions may be put forward in other places such as BBS and forums. Bloggers can't exhaustive search. It can be said that by coincidence, we think of one. Of course, the effect of these suggestions needs to be studied and tested.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
