A few days ago, I saw a video of a professor at the University of California (unknown) telling college students "why not cheat". The video also gave the Chinese literal translation of who did it. The professor of California said "why not cheat" The core idea is: if you develop the habit of opportunism in college, what should you do when you really go to work? What is the best result after cheating? You will only let your life fall into the situation of doing things you don't know what to do and you don't like to do. So don't cheat. If you cheat, you're hurting yourself. Over the years, there is a similar content film in the PPT of the "I talk about college life" public welfare report for college freshmen, which explains why I oppose cheating from another side: college students need to clearly realize that learning is your own thing! In order to live a dignified and happy life for yourself and your family, you must study hard, study hard, and study hard, not opportunistic and find shortcuts! Therefore, I strongly oppose learning to cope with exams, and even cheating in exams. It not only destroys justice and fairness, but also loses the most basic moral bottom line of life. This will be despised anywhere in the world! Be despised! Even subject to legal sanctions.

I sent the Chinese and English materials of the University of California professor's video to several academic peers, which aroused positive reactions from some peers. University of California professor on "why not cheat?" It seems to be aimed at college students, but in fact it can be aimed at the whole academic circles and officialdom. As a professor replied via wechat: not just students. Academic leaders Academicians should take the lead (against cheating). A senior at Zhengzhou University said, "I don't cheat. I don't have the courage to cheat". I replied to her and wanted to know why not cheat. She explained: "Cheating loses the ability to think and do things independently. You still have to do things by yourself. You still have to go your own way in life. Cheating also makes others distrust you.". I am very pleased with the answer of the college student. It seems that cheating in academic circles is not surprising. This is a terrible phenomenon. It poses a serious threat to the reputation of academic circles and can not be underestimated. This topic is related to the morality and cultivation of scholars.

Recently, someone told me that a university professor recently invited technicians from relevant departments of a famous technology company to give lectures to his students as head teachers. The R & D products of this technology company are consistent with the professional direction of students. The purpose of the professor is to let students understand the close relationship between professional learning and industry in advance, so as to stimulate students' learning enthusiasm and improve students' learning quality. The technical personnel of the enterprise specially mentioned the topic of the class teacher's morality and Cultivation on relevant occasions. He said that the professor has a rigorous style of study and excellent moral character and cultivation, which is why he is willing to accept the professor's invitation to make a report for college students. I think where do you start? It turned out that after returning home, the professor was successively invited to contact with the technical directors of some relevant science and technology enterprises to "exchange skills". Through these activities, the relevant technical director of the enterprise investigates and understands the research direction of the professor, and hopes that he can carry out scientific research for the relevant technical cooperation of the enterprise. However, the professor first thanked the trust of the leaders in charge of enterprise technology, and then made it clear that I have been mainly engaged in basic research for many years. At present, I have no desire and vision to carry out technology R & D. Because, with many years of overseas study and work experience, He understands that what is most lacking in this field is for some key technologies He said that he would not take money from enterprises to do applied technology research for the time being. In just a few years, the professor's view has won the admiration and appreciation of some enterprise executives. The technician who gave a lecture to undergraduate students this time said that the professor is obviously different from some university professors who attach great importance to money. These professors are very happy Huan exaggerates his ability to solve practical problems and makes a little bluff in order to make money from "horizontal projects" of the enterprise. Because, at present, universities have strict fund management for national, provincial and ministerial projects, commonly known as vertical projects, and it is generally difficult to get too much money to "improve the quality of family life". As far as I know, some universities clearly stipulate that university teachers can pay a certain amount of funds from horizontal (enterprise) scientific research projects as legal income. This will stimulate everyone's enthusiasm to take projects from enterprises, regardless of whether they have this strength or not. At this time, it is inevitable to take horizontal scientific research projects by relationship, because it is easy to make assignments with related projects.

There is no doubt that some of our university professors will seriously study enterprise cooperative scientific research projects as a solution. We call them expert professors who "write papers on the land of the motherland" facing the main battlefield of the national economy. In our country, whether universities or scientific research institutes, the vast majority of talents should belong to this kind of applied talents. For example, Mr. Yuan Longping, the rice expert I admire, Mr. Wang Xuan, the inventor of computer Chinese character laser phototypesetting system and electronic publishing system, the former vice chairman of the CPPCC National Committee and the vice chairman of the Central Committee of Jiusan Society, etc. In fact, if you can really solve some technical problems for enterprises, you should have a sense of achievement. Why worry about publishing papers. I see that some professors in some key universities mainly do horizontal projects, and they don't seem to be confused by the pressure of paper examination. Some teachers cooperate with enterprises for a long time, are deeply trusted by enterprises, and their life is also very natural and unrestrained. However, it is undeniable that we do have some professors who are keen on taking horizontal projects. These professors can get a large number of horizontal projects not because of their abilities, but because of various relationships, food and drink rebates and other means. In this way, cheating on scientific research results is inevitable. In these professors, it is difficult to see the noble morality and moral cultivation that a real scholar should have.