The biggest difference between postgraduate training and undergraduate training lies in the one-to-one relationship between teachers and students. In other words, the tutor guides the students, and the students complete the dissertation independently under the guidance of the tutor. This shows the close relationship between teachers and students. The differences in personality, personality, IQ, EQ, sense of responsibility and understanding between the two sides will inevitably lead to various contradictions. How to mediate and test the wisdom of both sides (premise: both sides are adults).

Tutors occupy a dominant position in terms of age, experience, knowledge and experience. There is no doubt that this is determined by the identity of both sides. The responsibilities and obligations of both parties must be clear. I understand that the teacher-student relationship should be a partnership, not a relationship between the boss and the wage earners. Under this premise, the discussion of different views is meaningful, such as equality, respect, understanding, cooperation and so on. Otherwise, we'll talk like chickens and ducks.

Now the relationship between graduate students and tutors is no longer the "one-day teacher and lifelong father" of the dignity of teachers at that time. The game between the interests of both sides is far from simple. Should we use students as tools or cultivate students as talents? Is the tutor the nanny or the tutor the teacher? Different values deal with contradictions between teachers and students in completely different ways.

Tutors do not guide and students do not learn, which means that one of the two sides has a problem, which is related to the utilitarian orientation of the overall environment. List the following, perhaps to generalize.

Performance of tutors without guidance:

Responsibility. Students are laissez faire. From enrollment to graduation, they are managed in a sheep herding way. They only provide opportunities, not help. It is also called respecting students' independent personality and autonomy.

Capacity issues. The tutor is lack of ability in some aspects, even worse than the students. With half the effort, the guidance is not in place. I know that I ask students, urge students, scold students, have no targeted and good strategies for students' problems, and always complain about "why don't students listen to me?" and so on.

Personality problems. The tutor has the final say. It looks very strict, but it's actually domineering and controlling. Those who obey me prosper and those who oppose me die. If you don't obey, you won't graduate. Most cases of intensification of contradictions between teachers and students are related to this.

Level problem. Tutors do not learn, do not make progress, do not keep pace with the times, rely on experience, but also die to face. Pay attention to "procedures" and "rules", take the form and pretend to be very responsible. If something goes wrong, clean yourself up.

Conceptual issues. Confuse degree thesis with academic thesis, only pay attention to students' articles, and pay no attention to the cultivation and improvement of students' comprehensive scientific research ability. There are interests in publishing articles, and each has its own place. As for whether students have the ability to engage in independent scientific research after graduation, it has nothing to do with me.

Performance of students not learning:

1. The purpose of postgraduate study is not pure. Graduate school for diploma, Graduate School for better job. Learning initiative and consciousness are not satisfactory. The rate of part-time work is probably due to such students. Shun then muddle through, reverse then all kinds of problems come one after another, put the responsibility on the tutor and the school, but never reflect on yourself.

2. Improper learning methods. Follow the learning method of exam oriented education and listening to teachers in class in the past, and get used to passive learning. Like to follow suit, follow others, lack of independent thinking, and do things without planning.

3. Self-respect. I have a strong sense of self and can't suffer any injustice. persist in one 's old ways. To diploma, do not pay; Freedom, not restraint; Praise, not criticize. He doesn't see him on weekdays. Graduation annoys you every day.

4. The school stipulates that only those who send articles before graduation can have the qualification of reply. They devote all their energy to the experiment. If they are eager to do some work, they should quickly send articles and leave after graduation. Ignoring reading and reading the original works, he became a "technical talent" when he graduated. His theoretical foundation is weak, his writing ability is lack, and his logical thinking is confused, which limits the sustainable development.

Theoretical basis, experimental skills, writing ability and logical thinking are indispensable for postgraduates. Posting articles is only a by-product of the training in the above aspects. Excellent students don't have to worry about sending articles. However, it is difficult to guarantee the quality of the articles "forced" students send. In addition to the number of "achievements" added to the school, it really can't see any value.

Both teachers and students should reflect on guidance and learning. In terms of tutors, it's your luck to meet students with special excellence or special circumstances. The merits and demerits are not in the tutors. If you can't be an immortal to show the way and turn stone into gold, at least you won't be taught to cheat. For most students, what can bring him lifelong benefits is the significance of guidance. Guide or not? How to guide? What is the effect of guidance? In terms of graduate students, it's your fate to meet good mentors or poor mentors. How you get along is determined by the way you do things. Cherish a good mentor. Learn what? How to learn? What is the effect of learning?

The solution lies in creating a relaxed and good environment for teachers and students to calm down and do scientific research. Overcome impetuosity, be eager for quick success and instant benefit, and pursue scientific research as a career rather than interests. On the premise that the conditions and treatment are guaranteed, we should concentrate on scientific research and not follow the trend or drift with the tide. The assessment policy should also be adjusted without forcing results, so as to make innovations.