In the previous five blog posts, I presented the problems existing in many dissertations, which may leave such an impression: first, the quality of the current dissertations is really worrying; Second, as a reviewer, I seem too picky. In fact, as far as my dissertation is concerned, some of them are well written. I will give excellent comments, and the joy is beyond words. The following is a brief introduction to my views on an excellent master's thesis.

First of all, I present my comments on this article - there is a certain technical processing.

Based on the recent literature in the corresponding research field, this paper takes junior middle school students as subjects to investigate the impact of interpersonal interaction model on external group attitude and behavior. The topic selection is cutting-edge, theoretical and potential application. The author has a good grasp of the literature in this research field, a comprehensive, appropriate and smooth review, a reasonable demonstration of the opposite questions, and the proposed research assumptions are effective and can be empirically tested. The research results are innovative and enlightening to investigate the controversial issues in relevant fields. The professional theoretical knowledge mastered by the author has depth and breadth, the research design is reasonable, the statistical analysis technology is advanced, the research work of the paper is difficult and the workload is large. The author's academic attitude is rigorous, abides by academic norms, has excellent logical analysis ability and language expression ability, can describe the complex statistical analysis results in an orderly manner, can analyze them in detail in summary and discussion, and has extraordinary theoretical level and research literacy, which is very rare.

This paper is an excellent master's thesis.

Then, state my views on excellent dissertation. Because the dissertation is written by graduate students and should represent the highest level of graduate students, the dissertation reflects the comprehensive quality of graduate students. Therefore, the evaluation of a dissertation is also the evaluation of graduate authors. Accordingly, the views on excellent dissertations also include the views on the corresponding authors.

First, the literature foundation should be solid. The author of the dissertation should really read and grasp the literature in his own research field, especially the recent literature and classic literature. The basis of research is literature. Even if the inspiration of research comes from reality, we still have to consult literature when carrying out research. For graduate students, if they do not grasp the literature, they can not really determine the topic, nor can they find the research problems. Therefore, for an excellent dissertation, the author's literature foundation is solid.

Whether the literature foundation is solid or not, it is clear to read the introduction of a dissertation. If the author can reasonably use the literature in his own language, that is, the citation of the literature is appropriate, the expression is natural and smooth, then it can show that the author has really learned and mastered the relevant literature. Otherwise, the literature foundation is not solid.

To determine whether the literature foundation is solid, you can also check the degree thesis in the literature cited by the author. If the references of a master's thesis are mainly other dissertations, or there are many other dissertations, it can be inferred that the author has not read the classic literature in the corresponding field, and has rarely or never read other issues in his reference list, especially works. Lack of understanding of the original documents, and can only rely on the secondary or even tertiary documents sorted out by others. Naturally, it is difficult to truly master the documents and use the documents freely.

Second, the problem should be demonstrated. For an excellent dissertation, the topic selection should be based on literature and logically demonstrated. Because of the solid literature foundation, the author knows the research progress and gaps in the corresponding fields. On this basis and background, the author can choose a gap to demonstrate. This gap is my own research problem. Only such a problem is a real scientific problem and worth studying. Because the research problem is demonstrated, the corresponding research significance is self-evident, and there is no need for the author to find out the theoretical and practical significance.

Understanding this truth, the author will select appropriate and powerful documents for gap demonstration in the literature review part of the dissertation, and strive to prove that there is such a meaningful and valuable gap in the corresponding field in every document and sentence, rather than listing documents, stacking materials, or even ensuring the length Gather enough words to present a large amount of irrelevant content.

Third, the research results are innovative. An excellent dissertation should fill the gap in the corresponding research field. Therefore, the research results are innovative. Of course, the degree of innovation of research results varies with the size of the selected gap. However, as long as the research is to fill the gap, the research results are bound to be innovative. Even if the ideal research results are not achieved, such research is at least valuable, rather than simply repeating the relevant research.

For a dissertation, if there are many "the results of this study are consistent with XXX (2020)" and "this study verifies the results of YYY (2021)", then the innovation is very low or even no innovation. To push forward is that the author did not find the gap in the corresponding research field and thought that he could study a certain problem, but the corresponding problem has actually been studied.

Meaningful research should fill the gap, so the research results will meaningfully promote the corresponding research fields. Therefore, excellent dissertations have clearly promoted relevant research fields, that is, they have made substantial contributions to specific research fields. Usually, a dissertation will summarize several conclusions. However, no amount of so-called conclusions can be regarded as innovation if they are not written from the perspective of promoting the corresponding research fields.

Fourth, the analysis and discussion are organized. For an excellent dissertation, the data analysis of the result part should be to test the research hypothesis. More complex statistical analysis techniques may be used, and other auxiliary statistical analysis may be required. Therefore, there will be more results, and the presentation forms will also include words, diagrams and tables. However, the presentation of the results must be organized. It is inappropriate for a master's thesis to have 48 diagrams and 46 tables in the results, which is in itself a performance of no primary and secondary and unclear organization.

It is particularly important that the discussion of an excellent dissertation must be organized. This orderliness is reflected in that the discussion should not only be based on the results, but also respond to the questions raised in the introduction, so as to make the waves of their specific research flow into the sea of the corresponding research field and reflect the value of their own research. Obviously, this requires the author to have a high theoretical level and research literacy.

In short, I think the dissertation that reaches the above 4 points can be rated as excellent. As mentioned earlier, the dissertation reflects the comprehensive quality of graduate students. There is no doubt that the authors of excellent dissertations are graduate students who are really willing to engage in research. They have a rigorous academic attitude and are high-quality talents with rich professional knowledge, extraordinary expression ability, excellent research ability and outstanding innovative spirit.