As a graduate tutor, thesis review (submission and Dissertation) is a routine work almost every year. In addition to the strict control of their own student papers, but also on the campus and outside the graduate thesis review.

The evaluation criteria for doctoral dissertations and master dissertations are different, depending on different levels. Doctoral students are teachers in future colleges and universities. From argument to discussion, from design to result, they should have certain innovation, whether the logic is reasonable, and whether the discussion has personal opinions, which naturally requires higher requirements. Most graduate students are not engaged in scientific research in Colleges and universities after graduation. They only need to tell a complete story and pay attention to the standardization and reliability of the results.

The writing level of postgraduate thesis is the first impression left to the reviewers. If the writing ability is lacking, it is difficult to get the approval of the reviewers. This also reflects the role of the Tutor (how to train and control the tutor?).

For doctoral dissertations, the foreword of the dissertations depends on whether the basis of argument is sufficient. As for the method, it depends on whether it is applicable, rather than the newer the better. As for the results of the paper, it depends on whether they conform to the scientific norms. For discussion, it depends on whether the mechanism is explained. Whether the conclusion is convincing. The deficiency and prospect reflect the author's thinking on scientific problems. In a word, whether the student has the ability to engage in scientific research independently.

There are different problems in master's thesis, preface and discussion. Just pay attention to the method and the result. In short, whether the student has received formal scientific research training.

Some postgraduates attach published papers in order to show their ability level, but they do not necessarily add points, sometimes even counterproductive. There is a suspicion that non first authors are free riders, that they are not suitable for the topic, that they make up the number, and that there is a great contrast between thesis writing and thesis writing. It is not difficult to judge whether the English abstract is a masterpiece of translation software or written by myself.

References must be targeted, not the more the better. Correspondence with the text is the key point of verification. Otherwise, there will be accumulation and abuse of literature.

The most important thing is honesty. If plagiarism and falsification of data and charts are found, it is a problem of academic ethics.

Two comments are enough. Reply after amendment and reply not agreed.

After the amendment, the reply is normal. No matter the major repair or minor repair, there will never be a "perfect" paper, right?

If you do not agree with the defense, you must have major problems in science, logic, academic ethics, writing and so on.