Looking back on the years of study, except that there was no formal English study in the rural middle school, the English score in the college entrance examination was only 30% of the total score, which did not affect the undergraduate admission. After entering the undergraduate course, English is just like politics. There are corresponding courses in each stage, and it takes a lot of time to study. At that time, our college English was still learned from ABC, and the students' foundation was also uneven. Postgraduate entrance examination to test English, and is 100% included in the total score, to postgraduate entrance examination, to shock learning English. For a master's degree, English is also a major course. In terms of class hours, it should be the course with the most class hours. I am a doctor, and still have English writing and oral English classes. Although great efforts have been made to learn English at the undergraduate and graduate levels, there is still a huge gap between the reading and writing abilities of English and Chinese because they are not the mother tongue. Now I often review the Chinese version and the English version of SCI. For me, it takes five times as much energy to review an English version as it does to review a Chinese version. Similarly, although there are some new ideas in consulting scientific and technological literature, articles in English SCI journals are better than those in Chinese journals. If there are articles in Chinese, I also like to read them in Chinese first and then in English.

I haven't studied the history of scientific development. I feel that the development of Western science and technology originated from the Renaissance in Italy. With the development of marine trade, the economic center of gravity shifted from ancient Rome in Central Europe to Holland and Britain in the West. In the late 19th century and the early 20th century, France and Britain in Western Europe became stronger and stronger, but the cultural development was still lagging behind the economic development. When Britain became the strongest so-called "sun never sets" empire in the world, the members of the Royal Society of England were still proud to write articles in Latin, so that many names of animals and plants in English now come from Latin. After the Second World War, the United States made a fortune in the war and became the first power in the world, which further strengthened the status of English and made the important international academic journals published in English.

In recent years, with China's economic development, industrial production capacity has been growing. Now industrial production capacity has become the focus of the world. However, the shift of cultural focus is much slower than that of productivity. Therefore, in terms of scientific and technological literature, English will still be in an important position for a long time to come.

For people like me who are mainly engaged in applied research, some of the functions of Chinese journals are not available in English journals. Chinese journals sometimes play the role and effect of advertising in the promotion of research technology. So,. However, it is undeniable that if we want the research results to have international influence, it is better to publish them in the influential SCI English journals. A few days ago, the editorial board members of a domestic environmental protection magazine discussed whether English should also be included and published in English. I put forward the following view: if the research papers related to application are published in Chinese, it is better to publish them in Chinese. If it is a basic research paper, it can be published in English. My opinion has been approved and affirmed by several editorial teachers.

With the development of the "four only" work, all the practices oriented by SCI papers have changed. For example, in the Yearbook of our college, it was previously stipulated that all SCI papers of every teacher can be listed, while Chinese articles are restricted. Although we know that it is much more difficult to publish articles in top Chinese magazines than ordinary SCI papers. Now the rules have been changed. Each person can only choose five English SCI papers and five Chinese journal papers to enter the college yearbook. Because our team, in order to let our domestic counterparts know what research we do and try our best to promote and apply our technology, attaches great importance to the publication of papers in Chinese journals. In this way, our team can occupy all the 10 positions. Some young teachers with high English level have published more than 10 SCI papers in English a year, It is necessary to select 5 representative articles from the more than 10 English papers to enter the college yearbook.

In recent years, the state's investment in science and technology has cultivated and grown more and more professors and doctoral guides, and the enrollment scale of doctoral students has also expanded rapidly. A few years ago, the enrollment scale of doctoral students has exceeded that of the United States. In this way, the enrollment scale is bound to be limited, and the phenomenon of too many monks and too few doctors has emerged. Some doctoral students have no doctoral candidates to recruit. How to determine this valuable index of doctoral enrollment, or to calculate the hero by SCI thesis. Therefore, as a performance appraisal, it is still SCI papers.

I always declare to the outside world that the goal of our research is to solve practical problems, and the publication of SCI papers and Chinese journal papers is only a by-product of our research. But for postgraduates, it is necessary to publish papers. If there is no paper published, it may be difficult to graduate without defense. Although it is now proposed that graduate students can graduate without publishing papers. The problem is that there is really no thesis. After graduation, besides the thesis and diploma, is there any other auxiliary means to prove your ability? If not, can you find a satisfactory job? Can you create conditions for further study? It's absolutely wrong to overemphasize the number of published papers, but it's definitely the other extreme, and it's also impossible to have none.