management and supervision. Universities at home and abroad are doing it, and foreign universities also take students' evaluation of teachers as a reference for teachers' promotion. No wonder foreign professors often give chocolate or candy to students who answer questions in class. One is to encourage or reward them to answer questions, The second is to win students' hearts and give teachers a good evaluation.

First of all, what is the purpose of College Students' evaluation of teachers? According to the practice of most universities, it is to supervise teachers and urge teachers to teach well. There is no better way for students to evaluate teachers. Just like consumers' evaluation of purchased goods, only consumers have more say. However, most university students' evaluation of teachers is carried out after the teachers have finished all the courses, which is just a shot in the back. Since the evaluation of the teacher is to urge the teacher to improve the teaching methods and improve the teaching effect, what is the use of the evaluation after the class is finished? We can't give these students the evaluation again! So this kind of evaluation is just an evaluation for the teacher. The teacher doesn't know what the students want the teacher to say and what their appetite is? According to the control theory, this is an open-loop control, there is no feedback, can not be corrected in time. Therefore, this kind of teaching evaluation has the suspicion of formalism, which can not really solve the problem. It also teaches individual students to do tricks behind their backs, and even retaliates against the teacher, which can not stimulate students' enthusiasm for teaching evaluation.

Since this is a quick evaluation, it has no direct benefit to the students, so it doesn't matter to the students. Since I am forced to evaluate the teacher, I will make a hasty evaluation. The evaluation lacks fairness.

The correct and reasonable way to evaluate a teacher is to evaluate the teacher in the process of class. For example, after two or three weeks of class, the students give an evaluation of the teacher's teaching method and effect, and directly point out the existing problems and the desired effect. The teachers make appropriate adjustments according to the students' evaluation to meet the students' requirements. For example, some teachers like to procrastinate, It's time to finish class. If you don't finish class, you will continue to talk for a few minutes. It seems that you are more dedicated. But the students are hungry and want to go to the canteen for a long time. After the students put forward, the teacher will improve.

Secondly, students can evaluate teachers face to face, which is called face-to-face listening to the voice of "grassroots"! There are many advantages to face-to-face teaching. Teachers and students are always in love with their father and son (mother and son). What can we not say? Do you have to judge from behind? Face to face evaluation, not only enhance the feelings of students and teachers, but also strengthen the communication between students and teachers, exercise the ability of communication between students and people, especially give suggestions to improve the speaking methods and skills, but also a training of students' comprehensive quality. The students we cultivate should be honest, not sad.

Finally, most universities adopt a formatted evaluation method, asking students to fill in "yes" or "no" or give a score, such as, "does the teacher have a passion for lecturing?", "“ Is the teacher's voice loud“ Does the teacher use the method of inspiration in his lectures? " wait. This is not only a lazy evaluation method, but also a passive evaluation method, and also a disrespect for students and teachers. It is impossible to sum up a person's strengths and weaknesses with a few or dozens of questions. Everyone has his own unique place, and everyone also has his own unique understanding and views. Some teachers may attract a certain student (s) with a single action, a smile, a phrase or a unique accent, so as to improve the students' listening effect. Correct and reasonable evaluation should be to let students evaluate teachers with their own comments. Don't our teachers often write comments to students? Only the language from one's heart and soul can truly express the students' true feelings for the teacher. The cold "yes", "no" or a number are the suppression and blasphemy of the feelings. After a long time, it will affect one's psychology and make people treat people as objects.

Teachers can be evaluated with comments or even essays on the Internet or anonymously. Each comment or essay can be sent to the teacher to let the teacher know the student's evaluation and make a response, so as to improve the teaching effect and meet the students' requirements as much as possible. This is the interaction between teaching and learning, the revelation of true feelings and the friendship between teachers and students, Is the normal personality training.

The university can also carry out the exhibition of students' evaluation of teaching, and display the good (sincere) comments or evaluation essays written by students to teachers. Teachers can also learn from each other, promote and progress each other.