Although the writing of this paper is directly from the process of discussion of these two articles ("the method and thinking of quantitative psychology research on the simple theory - the importance of combining macro and micro aspects", "about variables: we are different"), the core content of this paper is the author's observation, examination and experience for many years. These problems can improve and correct the mentality in academic research and to improve and improve the attitude of academic research High efficiency of scientific research and efficiency of thinking should be of positive value.

In academic research and even academic research, many scholars will have such mistakes: once someone points out their flaws, even points out that they are not comprehensive enough, they will immediately be dissatisfied or even fiercely refuted and refuted in order to refute, rather than pondering whether the other party really said something reasonable.

Scholars who really like wisdom and love truth should first point to the main points of the academic issues for thinking and analysis, rather than thinking about their own ideas or whether this statement will cause the other party's dissatisfaction, whether they say it is not safe (including whether the other party's statement may offend themselves). Of course, these problems are necessary to be considered in the real academic exchange and academic discussion, but they should be the second step to consider, not the first priority in academic thinking. Because once the second step should be considered as the first priority, on the one hand, the efficiency of his thinking mode will be greatly reduced. More importantly, it means that the primary motivation of his thinking is not to focus on the academic issues itself, but to study the psychological feelings and interpersonal relationship problems in the research of academic issues and their own problems Personal interests are before academic issues themselves, which is easy to fall into a phenomenon mentioned in my previous article: the phenomenon that the mindedness caused by narrow mind (including mental health and excessive utilitarian) impairs the appearance of academic creativity (see "three types of Stupidity: intellectual stupidity, mindedness stupidity and methodology stupidity"). Although there is a saying in ancient China that the word "when hearing Tao is dead at night" (including hearing it, it is joyful), the requirements of such statements are too high and the level is too high. Only in a few cases will this psychological reaction happen. Most of the time, for the vast majority of people, they can be satisfied with the charm of wisdom and joy in the truth of knowledge itself Han's perception is a good reward mechanism for brain learning, reward mechanism of brain thinking and a healthy mind.

The last summary is: in academic thinking and academic discussion, healthy thinking psychological mechanism is not only important for the health of academic atmosphere, but also very important and will have a key impact on the improvement of the efficiency of the parties' own thinking and even the improvement of academic attainments. I would like to share with the readers.