Graduate thesis is the only written material to measure whether it reaches the level of dissertation and whether it can participate in the defense. Therefore, we must have a correct attitude and be careful in writing the thesis.

First of all, words must be smooth, readable and logical. The format must meet the requirements of graduation thesis. If the words are in a mess and the logic is confused, they can only be returned or denied.

Any reviewer who gets the text of a paper usually takes a rough look at the overall format and then examines the topic. Then look at the summary for the general content. If the title or abstract is not clear, it will not give the reviewer a good first impression. I even feel that I can't go on reading this kind of paper. I'm afraid it's very bad.

It is needless to say that the requirement of doctoral thesis is higher than that of master thesis. Doctoral dissertations have high requirements on the theoretical basis, experimental design, results and discussion of postgraduates, and they should also be innovative.

The title should be concise and clear without ambiguity. Abstract is the epitome of the full text concise, good abstract makes people have the desire to read down. Key words must be associated with the content of the paper, arranged in logical order.

The theoretical basis of the foreword part reflects the academic vision of doctoral students, the basis and starting point of topic selection, the accuracy control of problems, the significance and value of work. Through literature review, we can see the thickness of theoretical foundation and the ability of generalization. The research content must be a series of work for a certain mechanism as a whole (irrelevant work can not be kneaded together). The purpose and significance of the research determine the value of the paper.

The method cannot be single. Method selection should explain why these methods are used and whether they are suitable for solving problems? The familiarity with the method and the design concept of the experiment can judge the researcher's thinking and ability to use the technology. Where to start with, progressive or parallel. Each method should confirm and support each other.

The results should be detailed, reliable and realistic. The chart is clear and the statistics is used properly.

Discussion can best show students' scientific thinking and discrimination ability. You can't be vague, and you can't repeat the results. We should infer, compare and analyze from various data, and draw convincing conclusions according to scientific laws. To make an objective evaluation of one's own work, to point out the deficiencies or areas for improvement, or the direction of future efforts, is also what a doctoral dissertation should write. Be careful with the words you first found.

The conclusion should be simple, clear and highly generalized. The accurate description of innovation points reflects the author's summarizing ability.

The references should be checked carefully. If it is found that the literature does not correspond to each other, it reflects that the science is not rigorous, and even affects the credibility of the full text.

Some doctoral students think that as long as they publish a few SCI articles during their study, they can reach the level of dissertation. This is a complete misunderstanding. A dissertation is a complete treatise, not just an individual result. If the article you publish is irrelevant to the topic of your paper, it will also have a negative effect. So I'd better write my graduation thesis carefully.

Between the lines, whether you can see whether you have the ability to independently engage in scientific research is the standard for judging a doctoral dissertation!

Basically, as long as the topic can be selected, the method is feasible, and there are certain data and preliminary analysis, the master's thesis is reasonable, and it does not require innovation. A relatively complete experiment is enough. But writing smoothly and logically is also a basic requirement.

In short, a good paper must be ideological, logical, innovative, readable and normative.

Those papers that are pieced together, listed, pasted, and the words are all problem papers.